Blockchain-based smart contracts indubitably fall subject to private international law, a legal expert has argued in a post published to Oxford University's Business Law Blog today, Jan. 23.
Giesela Rühl - a professor of Private International Law and co-director of the Centre for European Studies at the Friedrich Schiller University in Jena, Germany - entitled her analysis "The Law Applicable to Smart Contracts, or Much Ado About Nothing?" As the title implies, the report argues that the presumed friction between smart contracts and established legal precedent may be over-exaggerated.
"[T]he initial hopes that smart contracts will free the exchange of goods and services from national laws do not seem to come true.
The classic questions of contract law arise also when parties enter into a smart contract.
Just like all other contracts, smart contracts demand that the law answers them.
The decisive question is not whether smart contracts are subject to the law, but rather to which law they are subject.
Professor Rühl focused on the European context, contending that "There can be little doubt" that the EU's core legal provision for civil and commercial contractual obligations - the 2008 Rome I Regulation - does in fact apply to smart contracts.
Noting that smart contracts are typically "Merely a piece of software or programme code that controls, monitors, or documents the execution of a contract that has been concluded elsewhere," Rühl argued that Rome I applies instead to the contract which the code facilitates.
Only in instances where the smart contract itself is hard-programmed to be legally binding - i.e. where "The contract is comprehensively and exclusively embodied in a software code," or where software is used for the contract's actual conclusion - would Rome I directly apply to the smart contract as such, she added.
Last fall, the United States Commodity Futures Trading Commission commissioner Brian Quintenz critiqued the well-known crypto adage "Code is law." Quintenz argued that even though smart contracts may complicate existing frameworks and question of accountability, they nonetheless fall subject to regulations and particular existing legal precedents.
Smart Contracts Don't Necessarily Disrupt Traditional Contract Law, Expert Argues
Publié le Jan 23, 2019
by Cointele | Publié le Coinage
Coinage
Mentionné dans cet article
Nouvelles récentes
Voir tout
Blockchain Bites: Bitcoin's Run, Uniswap's Hemorrhaging Value, Anchorage's Banking Bid
Bitcoin is nearing all-time highs in price and market cap last set three years ago.
Japan's megabanks to lead experiment with digital yen
We have, in order, Cheese Bank with a $3.3 million theft, Akropolis with its $2 million loss, Value DeFi with a whopping $6 million exploit and finally Origin Protocol's loss of $7 million.
Number of new Bitcoin addresses spikes amid growing FOMO
Japan's three largest banks, as part of a group of 30 private sector actors, are set to collaborate on an experiment with a digital yen.
Not just Wall Street: Quant trader explains why Bitcoin price is going up
Sam Trabucco, a quantitative trader at Alameda Research, believes four general factors are pushing up the price of Bitcoin.